DESIGN PATENT BLOG POSTS

Design Patent Data for June 17, 2025
948 Design Patents issued on June 17, 2025. Notable Issues Five applications have a 103 Obviousness analysis with an LKQ discussion. These are: 29895014 (Wine

Design Patent Data for June 10, 2025
973 Design Patents issued on June 10, 2025. Notable Issues Three applications have a 103 Obviousness analysis with an LKQ discussion. These are: 29856109 (Femoral

Overcoming Obviousness in Design Patents with Strategic Title Amendment and LKQ Advocacy
Application No. 29/852,171 | Issued June 3, 2025 as D1,078,041 In this week’s featured prosecution, we examine the successful traversal of an obviousness rejection in

Design Patent Data for June 3, 2025
Design patent practitioners might find interesting and useful some weekly design patent data. If anyone is interested in additional statistics, information, issues, or recommended practices

Faster Design Patents Without the Rocket Docket
Now that the expedited examination procedure for design patents has been suspended, what can practitioners do to speed up prosecution? We know from pendency statistics

Understanding Hybrid 2D/3D Disclosure in Design Patent Prosecution: Lessons from Maatita and PTAB Decisions
Are hybrid 2D/3D design disclosures sufficiently definite under 35 U.S.C. § 112? The answer is of growing importance because it directly impacts indefinite depth rejections,

Obviousness in Automotive Part Design: Key Takeaways from a Fender Flare Application
Design patent prosecution can be a complex and nuanced process, particularly when determining whether a design for an automotive part is obvious in light of

Breaking Par on Design Patents: Using LKQ v. GM to Challenge Obviousness-Type Double Patenting
The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Tech. Operations LLC, 102 F.4th 1280 (Fed. Cir. 2024) has significantly altered the framework

Keeping Time with LKQ: A Case Study on Design Patent Obviousness
The prosecution history of Design Patent Application No. 29/860,441 (US D1,057,742) provides an insightful case study on the evolving obviousness standard in design patents post-LKQ

More Than Obvious: Leveraging LKQ v. GM to Overcome Anticipation Rejections
Introduction The landmark LKQ Corp. v. GM Glob. Tech. Operations LLC, 102 F.4th 1280 (Fed. Cir. 2024) decision reshaped the landscape of design patent law

The Top 50 Most Cited Cases in Design Patent Prosecutions: What They Reveal About the Field
When analyzing design patent prosecutions with non-final rejections over the past four years (2021-2024), we uncovered interesting insights from the top 50 most cited cases.

Detailed Instructions for Using Design Patent Pro (DPP) ProSearch
The first step is entering a search term in the search bar. For example, if you receive a rejection based on In re Owens, you may want to research how other design patent applicants have handled similar rejections. To search, type “In re Owens” in the search bar, leave the issue date empty, and click Search or return.