June 17 Data

Design Patent Data for June 17, 2025

948 Design Patents issued on June 17, 2025.

Notable Issues

Five applications have a 103 Obviousness analysis with an LKQ discussion. These are:

29895014 (Wine Case – D1079464)

29838217 (Container – D 1079475)

29813174 (Display Screen or Portion Thereof with Graphical User Interface – D1079732)

29770373 (Display Board – D1079803)

29748412 (Electronic Display Screen with Graphical User Interface – D1079708)

One application involves a 2D/3D Indefiniteness rejection with a discussion of In re Maatita.

29769874 (Lattice – D1079706)

(Links to selected prosecution documents as obtained from ProSearch by Design Patent Pro. Complete prosecution histories can be obtained from the USPTO Patent Center)

Type of Rejections/Objections (Numbers approximate)

The two most frequent rejections and objections are for indefinite depth (104) and improper or missing broken line statements (98).

For information and tips on how to avoid and respond to these types of rejections, see broken line statements and indefinite depth.

Number of Rejections, Objections, and Restrictions

Non-Final Rejections (328) (35%)

Final Rejections (50) (5%)

Ex Parte Quayle Actions (194) (20%)

Restriction Requirements (67) (7%)

Pendency

The average time filing to issue is 619 days (20.3 months), which is lower than last month’s 642 days. 262 (27.6%) are expedited, with an average filing to issue time of 198 days (6.5 months). 686 (72.4%) are non-expedited, with an average filing to issue time of 780 days (25.6 months).

Picture of Robert G. Oake, Jr.

Robert G. Oake, Jr.

is a Registered Patent Attorney and Board Certified in Patent Litigation, Civil Trial Law, and Civil Practice Advocacy by the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He holds two LL.M (Master of Law) Degrees, including an LL.M in Patent and Intellectual Property Law (with highest honors) from George Washington University Law School.

Robert served as lead trial and appellate counsel for Egyptian Goddess in the landmark case of Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa. He has tried to verdict as lead counsel cases involving design patents, utility patents, and trademarks, and has argued eleven cases before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals including an en banc case involving a design patent.

Robert currently serves as one of four members on the Patent Litigation Specialty Program Commission of the National Board of Trial Advocacy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *