Designpatentpro https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html HOME Obviousness in Automotive Part Design: Key Takeaways from a Fender Flare Application ProSearch Keeping Time with LKQ: A Case Study on Design Patent Obviousness Unauthorized Faster Design Patents Without the Rocket Docket TABLES Reissue Design Patent Table More Than Obvious: Leveraging LKQ v. GM to Overcome Anticipation Rejections Understanding Hybrid 2D/3D Disclosure in Design Patent Prosecution: Lessons from Maatita and PTAB Decisions Breaking Par on Design Patents: Using LKQ v. GM to Challenge Obviousness-Type Double Patenting The Top 50 Most Cited Cases in Design Patent Prosecutions: What They Reveal About the Field Ex Parte Quayle – Third Most Cited Case ProSearch Updates Indefiniteness Standard at the USPTO – App. No. 29/871,033 – Insulation Resistance Tester – December 24, 2024 Understanding Design Patent Obviousness Principles following LKQ v GM Design Patents and Non-Final Rejections – 2024 Exploring the Depths: Overcoming Section 112 Rejections in Design Patent Prosecution Teaching Away Update – Roulette Game Detailed Instructions for Using Design Patent Pro (DPP) ProSearch Obviousness Rejection Overcome under LKQ Analysis – App. No. 29/838,012 – Litter Box – December 31, 2024 ProSearch Case Table New LKQ Obviousness Analysis – App. No. 29/911,351 – Attachment for Massage Device – December 3, 2024 Obviousness-Type Double Patenting – App. No. 29/866,647 – Golf Club Head – December 24, 2024 Patent Application and Case Flow Opt-out preferences How to Avoid Objections and Rejections to Broken Line Statements in Design Patent Applications – Part 5 (Important General Principles) Cookies Policy Page Top 50 Design Patent Case #4 In re Blum Account Sign Up Basic and Corporate Design Patents and Section 112 Top 50 Design Patent Cases #1 International Seaway Trading Corporation v. Walgreens Corp. ProSearch Basic Membership – 14 Day Free Trial ProSearch Basic Membership Top 50 Design Patent Case #5 In re Thorington Login Top 50 Design Patent Cases #2 Gorham v. White The New York Times – Gorham v. White ProSearch Basic Membership – Corporate Prosecution Law ProSearch Update – Sec. 112 Indefinite Depth Rejections and In re Maatita How to Avoid Objections and Rejections to Broken Line Statements in Design Patent Applications – Part 3 (History, Development, and Current State) Analogous and Non-Analogous Art in Design Patent Law How to Avoid Objections and Rejections to Broken Line Statements in Design Patent Applications – Part 1 Introduction Don’t Get Tripped Up Over Wire Frame Lines Customer Complaints about Product Quality Establish Irreparable Harm for Preliminary Injunction When can portions of a solid line be converted to broken lines? Secondary Considerations in Design Patent Law