Design Patent Pro https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html Ordinary Observer Analyzer Patentability and Obviousness Claiming Strategy Planner Office Action Response Design Drawing Review HOME ProTools An Examiner Asks Amazon’s AI for the Date: What 343 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider The Top Three, Illustrated: Inside the best prosecution histories of October 20, 2026 Library Nobody Answered: What 51 abandoned design applications show and what practitioners might consider The Shape the Consumer Never Sees: What 509 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider The Review Is Not the Product: What 285 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider No Declaration Needed: What 431 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider Line Weight as Evidence of Possession: What 466 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider Design Patent ProGuide – Declarations Under 1.130(a) Design Patent ProGuide – Figure Descriptions Design Patent ProGuide – Claims Functionality in Design Patent Law Appendices in U.S. Design Patent Applications: Uses, Risks, and What the Prosecution Record Shows Design Patent ProGuide – Appendices Design Patent ProGuide – Broken Line Statements Design Patent ProGuide – Titles From “Substantially the Same” to “Substantially Similar” and “Plainly Dissimilar”: How the Design Patent Infringement Standard Drifted from Gorham Lost in the Drawings: What 21 abandoned design applications show and what practitioners might consider Analogous Art After LKQ: What the Examination Record Shows and What Practitioners Might Consider The Reason to Combine After LKQ: What the Examination Record Shows and What Practitioners Might Consider BLOG Secondary Considerations After LKQ: What the Examination Record Shows and What Practitioners Might Consider Analogous Is Not the Same Article: What 198 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider Free CLE Previews Design Patent Obviousness after LKQ v. GM Design Patent Reissue Practice Broken Line Statements in Design Patent Applications Obviousness after LKQ v. GM COURSES The Title after Curver Luxembourg v. Home Expressions Prosecution History Disclaimer after Top Brand v. Cozy Comfort The Differences the Examiner Skipped: What 444 prosecution histories show and what practitioners might consider Prosecuting Design Patents for Enforcement Learn About ProSearch + AI Q&As AI Credits ProSearch About ProSearch ProSearch + AI Q&As Learn About ProSearch AI How ProSearch AI Works Sign In General Terms and Conditions Common rejections in design patent reissue applications